Last week witnessed increased rainfall records given most parts of Kitui county received heavy downpour.  "A number of stations recorded very heavy rainfall exceeding 70mm in 24 hours on 3rd in Endau and Mui and again in Endau in 4th", said  Director Daniel Mbithi. 

The other weather conditions like temperature and wind remain unchanged this week since the maximum temperature will range between 24°C and 32°C while the minimum temperature range is expected to vary from 16°C to 22°C.

Strong winds are expected to blow from north eastern side to south eastern side of the county of Kitui at a speed of 25knots [12.86m/s].

The International media such as Al Jazeera and the BBC devoted large sections of their coverage to tell the story about the former Zambia President's worsening health,  death and divided legacy. Lungu had been receiving treatment for cancer at Mediclinic Medforum Hospital in Pretoria. His daughter, Tasila Lungu, broke the news to the public, saying, “My father passed away peacefully, but our hearts are shattered. We are trying to come to terms with the loss of a man who gave so much to his family and country.”

Yet, even as they mourned, the family found themselves entangled in legal battles and political tensions that would follow them for months.

For the Lungu family, the wish was simple: a quiet farewell. They had planned a private burial in Johannesburg, hoping to grieve away from the glare of politics. “We just wanted to say goodbye in peace,” said a family member, requesting anonymity.

The Zambian government, however, insisted that Lungu, as a former president, be honoured with a state funeral in Lusaka. Such ceremonies are customary for Zambian leaders since independence from the British in 1964.

The disagreement reached the courts. A High Court in Pretoria halted the private burial just hours before it was to begin. The court ruled that Lungu’s body be repatriated to Zambia for burial with state honours. At the reading of the judgment, his sister, Bertha Lungu, was seen in tears, a moment that captured the human toll of political disputes.

Even before Lungu’s death, his family had been navigating investigations that brought their private lives into public view. Authorities in Zambia examined properties, vehicles, and other assets believed to be linked to unexplained wealth acquired during his presidency.

His son, Dalitso Lungu, was arrested in 2023 alongside his wife after authorities said they had uncovered dozens of vehicles and other assets suspected to be proceeds of crime. A court later ordered him to surrender property and vehicles worth millions of dollars.

The former first lady, Esther Lungu, faced charges related to properties believed to be illicitly acquired. Even Tasila, who had publicly shared her father’s death, was later charged with money laundering.

“The accusations are politically motivated,” said a Patriotic Front party official. “Our family is being targeted even in mourning.”

Lungu’s political life was marked by both achievements and fierce rivalries. Defeated in the 2021 elections by Hakainde Hichilema of the United Party for National Development, the tension between the two men and their supporters has lingered, shaping Zambia’s political landscape.

Even after leaving office, the legal challenges facing his family have been influenced by the lingering shadow of political rivalry. The grief of losing a father and husband is intertwined with the stress of legal proceedings, creating a complex emotional landscape for the family.

Behind court rulings, asset seizures, and public debates is a family trying to heal. For the Lungu family, Edgar Lungu’s death did not bring closure; it opened a chapter of public scrutiny and national debate.

“Every time we try to grieve, there is a court case or a headline reminding us of his legacy in a way we cannot control,” said another family member.

For Zambia, the events highlight how the consequences of leadership and allegations of corruption can extend far beyond a president’s term. Decisions made in power can shape families, institutions, and national memory for years.

Edgar Lungu’s story is a reminder that leadership carries responsibilities, and that the human cost of politics often stretches beyond office  sometimes into the lives of those left behind.

The case pits the petitioner, Newton Kariuki Ndwiga, against the declared winner of the November 27, 2025 by-election, Leo Wa Muthende Njeru, with the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission also named as a respondent in the proceedings.

The election dispute is being heard by Justice Richard Mwongo at the Embu High Court, after being assigned as an election court to determine the validity of the by-election results. By law, election petitions must be heard and concluded within six months. 

During the opening remarks, Kariuki’s legal team, led by Ndegwa Njiru, told the court that the petition seeks to nullify the by-election, arguing that the electoral process failed to meet constitutional standards of transparency, accountability, and adherence to the law.

The petitioner claims that several irregularities occurred during the voting process, including discrepancies between the number of voters who cast ballots and the number of registered voters in some polling stations.

Kariuki, who took the witness stand to testify in support of his petition, cited Ngagara Primary School and Ngiiri Polling Station as examples where the number of votes allegedly exceeded the registered voter turnout.

He told the court that such discrepancies raise serious questions about the integrity of the election and form part of the grounds upon which the results should be invalidated.

Kariuki further requested the court to order a forensic examination of the KIEMS kits, arguing that the devices should be scrutinized to determine whether all voters who cast ballots were properly identified and cleared through the biometric system.

In addition, he asked the court to order a recount of the votes cast during the by-election to verify whether the final tally accurately reflected the will of the electorate.

The petitioner also alleged irregular voting in Mwondu Polling Station, claiming that some individuals who cast ballots there were registered voters from counties outside Embu County.

Kariuki further told the court that violence was reported in several polling stations, including Kaugu Polling Station, which he claimed affected his supporters during the voting exercise.

“Violence was widespread across polling stations in Mbeere North and it was being instigated by State officers. This intimidated my supporters, and the fourth respondent became the beneficiary of that violence,” Kariuki told the court.

He also alleged that voter bribery occurred in multiple polling stations across the constituency, arguing that such acts compromised the credibility and fairness of the election. Among the polling stations Kariuki asked the court to scrutinize are Itiira, Ishiara, Kune, Kanyuambora, Maragu, Karwari, Kiathambu, and Ndutori Primary Schools, saying a detailed examination would help determine whether the number of votes cast matched the number of registered voters.

However, the defence team representing Wa Muthende, led by Dr.

Adrian Kamotho, dismissed the claims and told the court that the election was conducted fairly, transparently, and in full compliance with the law.

Lawyer Charles Mwongela, representing the electoral commission, also defended the process, stating that the commission conducted the election in strict adherence to the Constitution and electoral laws, adding that the petition seeks to overturn the legitimate will of the people.

The court proceedings come months after another petition challenging the same election was dismissed for failure to deposit the legally required security for costs, leaving Kariuki’s case as the main active petition questioning the legitimacy of the by-election outcome.

The hearing is expected to proceed on a day-to-day basis , with the court set to hear testimonies from witnesses, examine electoral materials, and determine whether the allegations raised meet the legal threshold to nullify the Mbeere North by-election.

In his address, Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna announced plans to work with Ukambani leaders as the country prepares for 2027 General elections. Sifuna added that since the Ukambani region stood with late ODM leader Raila Odinga in his presidential ambitions, it was time to reciprocate to the voting bloc. "Who said Kambas are enemies just because Raila is gone? We shall uphold the unity that existed for years with Wiper leader Kalonzo Musyoka and the entire Ukambani community ", said Hon Sifuna.

The senator's foray in the Lower Eastern Region comes in the midst of fallout with the Oburu Oginga faction of ODM party which is firmly in the broad-based government. 

Embakasi MP Babu Owino who accompanied Sifuna team urged youth to vote for development-oriented leaders next year. He noted that the youth are a fresh energy in the political landscape and they should be supported through mentorship and education in order to be fully equipped for future opportunities. 

Other political leaders who accompanied the Linda Mwananchi caravan were Hamisi MP Charles Gumini and Makueni MCAs.

As Kenya gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections, this reality is becoming more visible in the re-emergence of familiar political actors who are repositioning themselves within new alliances and narratives despite their past records in governance. The uncomfortable truth is that many voters are not necessarily choosing change but are instead choosing familiarity, even when that familiarity has previously produced governance failures, economic strain, or institutional stagnation.

Across modern democracies, including Kenya, a recurring pattern has emerged in which political actors who presided over economic decline, corruption scandals, or policy paralysis often return to the political stage years later repackaged as reformers. Alliances shift, rivalries dissolve, and yesterday’s opposition figures become today’s establishment leaders.

This process creates the illusion of change without altering the underlying political structures that shape governance outcomes. The persistence of such leaders through electoral legitimacy raises a critical question about the nature of voter decision-making.

Elections are too often influenced less by institutional memory and more by emotional momentum, where citizens vote in response to charisma, identity affiliations, temporary frustration, or campaign rhetoric rather than long-term governance records. In such environments, accountability becomes negotiable, allowing past mismanagement to be reframed as victimhood or contextualized as the result of external constraints rather than leadership shortcomings.

Another significant factor that enables the recycling of political failure is the erosion of ideological politics. Historically, opposition movements offered alternative policy visions that differed fundamentally from those of incumbent governments. In contemporary politics, however, opposition frequently represents displaced factions of the same elite structure rather than a genuinely distinct governance philosophy.

When such actors ascend to power, they often replicate the very institutional patterns they previously criticized, thereby reinforcing continuity instead of disruption. As Kenya moves closer to the 2027 elections, early political realignments suggest that the contest may once again revolve around personalities rather than policy frameworks. Familiar names are returning to the national conversation not necessarily with new governance models but with renewed political branding, and this risks transforming elections into mechanisms for elite rotation rather than platforms for structural reforms.

Political recycling cannot persist without voter participation, whether conscious or unconscious. When citizens prioritize identity over competence, symbolism over substance, and short-term political gratification over long-term institutional integrity, they inadvertently weaken the accountability function of elections. This dynamic creates a feedback loop in which leaders learn that perception matters more than performance and that strategic campaign positioning can substitute for governance delivery.

Over time, political memory becomes selective, allowing failures to fade from public scrutiny while successes are amplified through narrative framing. In such circumstances, democracy risks becoming cyclical rather than progressive, as leadership changes fail to produce meaningful policy or institutional transformation.

Breaking this cycle requires a shift in how democracy is practiced at the citizen level, particularly as the country prepares for 2027. Voting must evolve from an act of hope into an act of judgment grounded in historical awareness and policy scrutiny. This involves interrogating leadership beyond slogans and alliances by assessing past records, evaluating proposed reforms, and distinguishing between systemic change and personal rebranding.

Democracy functions effectively only when voters remember and connect past performance to present ambition. Ultimately, leadership recycling is sustained not solely by politicians but by the absence of rigorous voter scrutiny. As the next election approaches, the central question facing citizens is no longer whether change is promised but whether change is demanded, because the true test of democratic maturity lies in the willingness to reject failure even when it returns disguised as experience.